Inferno

Inferno

By Ron Howard

  • Genre: Thriller
  • Release Date: 2016-10-12
  • Advisory Rating: PG-13
  • Runtime: 2h 1min
  • Director: Ron Howard
  • Actors:
  • Awards:
  • iTunes Price: USD 14.99
5.7/10
5.7
From 2,512 Ratings

Inferno Description

Academy Award® winner Ron Howard returns to direct the latest thriller in Dan Brown’s (Da Vinci Code) billion-dollar Robert Langdon series, Inferno, which finds the famous symbologist (again played by Tom Hanks) on a trail of clues tied to the great Dante himself. When Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones), a doctor he hopes will help him recover his memories. Together, they race across Europe and against the clock to stop the unleashing a global virus that would wipe out half of the world’s population.

Using first-hand accounts from fire fighters and survivors, this compelling 2-part documentary series delves into the devastating fury of Australian bushfires and the astounding technology that is helping to predict, prevent and fight these violent natural disasters.

Inferno Trailer

Inferno Photos

Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture Inferno picture

Inferno Movie Reviews

  • This Isn't DaVinci Code

    Emerson Sterner
    4
    This movie is hard one for me to grade because it's still a fairly good thriller and there is a lot to take away from it. It just doesn't feel like the others. It has a different aspect ratio, it's shot on digital, the soundtrack isn't nearly as good as the other two and it's just been too long since Angels and Demons for this movie to still feel relavent. But it's still a good watch. You just have to accept it for what it is...different.
  • Lol. Kicker Lol

    Elvir81 :)
    5
    Right.
  • Cool version of Inferno

    18holliday92
    3
    What we have here is the manipulation of a fantastic book by Ron Howard. He may make lots of money on this movie, just because it's a Dan Brown, but it isn't right of Dan to authorize this butchering of his wonderful novel. The book was amazing. This was disappointing.
  • woah... what is this?!?!

    Rångø
    1
    My feelings, opinion, and experience mirror other reviewers who reiterate their disdain; don't bother buying, renting, or let alone watching this movie. I read the book and I despise this movie (Columbia Pictures, Ron Howard, and Dan Brown should be embarassed and horrified at what they've created).
  • Completely unrealistic

    Dieuwer
    2
    In short: nutcase billionaire wants to wipe out half of humanity to safe the rest. Right... His girl friend is in it too. Right... Tom Hanks does the usual running around from one cultural iconic building to another to find the next clue. Acting is ok, but background research by the director is below standards. The Istanbul Cisterns rebranded as "Sunken Palace"? Really?? I agree with Tomatoes: the movie is rotten.
  • I wish I could leave no stars.

    Steve_Keas
    1
    The other negative reviews are spot on. If you've read the book, you'll likely hate the movie. I tortured myself to keep watching after only 5 minutes. The movie is Ron Howard's worst work. Terrible adaptation. Dan Brown is a masterful writer. Whoever wrote this script is not. After reading the book, I found myself longing to tour Florence, Venice and even Istanbul. I found myself wanting to read The Divine Comedy. I googled Dante's Symphony by Liszt. Brown described many fascinating places in three historic cities. He crafted great plot twists, highlighted a serious concern for us to wrestle with, tugged at our ethical consciences, taught us art history, and did it all with rich characters. This movie re-wrote characters, betraying the very plot of the story. The story was hurried. There was no time to appreciate the cities or to grasp their historic personalities. The dialogue was extremely awkward, not only lacking faithfulness to the book, but dismissing the very characters themselves. An overall betrayal to faithful fans. This movie is the epitome of bastardizing a story to appeal to easily amused masses. In the end, it seems as though the screenwriter has taken on the character of Bertrand Zobrist. But instead of rearranging the levels of hell and creating a plague, has rearranged a great book and plagued the brains of those of us who desire more than two hours of becoming a mindless zombie. But hey, if you haven't read the book and don't mind ridiculously cliche Hollywood movie scripts, knock yourself out. I suppose it is possible that this movie is suspenseful. I wouldn't know. I was too busy feeling disgusted and angry at every corner. I can't believe Dan Brown would allow them to rewrite the DNA of a brilliant book and make it intellectually sterile.
  • Great

    bigguyforyou
    5
    If you liked Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons you'll like this one too
  • Poor Reviews...but

    femlou
    3
    Can this movie be a rental ? It is low rated.
  • Not great and maybe not good.

    Big AV
    2
    I don't know if someone would understand it if they had not read the book and if one had read the book, I don't think one would like it much. I saw it the day I finished the book and to be honest, I thought the book one of Dan Brown's weakest. I don't want to provide spoilers so I will say that I don't think the source material was very good so any changes may have been done to try to make the story more...ummm...not believable but less silly. If you have time to kill, okay, this may be okay but otherwise your time could probably be spent doing something else.
  • Best Tom Hanks EVER

    appalcarp
    5
    Loved the movie, had you guessing right up to the end like Sting, Sting II or Ocean's 11. Sorry I missed it in the theatres. Don't let any sour apples stop you from enjoying a great story!
  • Yuk

    Coldnortht6e
    1
    Disappointing start to finish. Tom Hanks subpar performance was dull and totally boring as if just putting in the time Dialogue slow and predictable Scenes poorly staged and acted
  • A very good movie

    JCarver.Auburn
    5
    If you're a Dan Brown fan, or Tom Hanks fan, I think you'll enjoy the movie. In my opinion, it's better than its two predecessors, particularly in its execution; Ron Howard & Tom Hanks, both, did great jobs.
  • disappointed

    steven_k61
    2
    i think they are done with this series. not very well done at all.
  • Wish I could get my $15 back

    Leoguy1400
    1
    Big fan of the first two movies. I was super excited when I saw the new Robert Langdon sequel had been released. Just watched it and I just got more disappointed the longer I watched it. Managed to Finnish it. Now I need to re-watch the first two just to wash this terrible movie out of my mind. Very disappointed Ron!
  • Horrible

    Aza-USA
    1
    Waste your money somewhere else!
  • What a mess

    why cant I change my nickname
    1
    I can't believe Tom Hanks agreed to do this. On paper it looks great, it has big names attached to it, but really, what a muddled mess. I couldn't sit through the whole movie, so I admit I haven't seen the ending. But the 1 hour that I did sit through it was the most uncomfortable 1 hour of my life. Every line, dialogue and "action" scene was downright cringeworthy. Don't waste your time on this.
  • So mcuh better than critics said

    NIckelbutt's mom
    4
    Both my husband and I liked the first 2 installments of the trilogy but when this got bad ratings out of the gate, we decided to not see it in the theater and wait to rent it. Not that we give critics taht much weight, but even teh audience wasn't happy w/ it, so we waited. That was not needed. I never finished the book becuase it was hard to follow and boring to me, I did feel the movie was a tad hard to follow at times, but I still enjoyed it. My husband has never read any of the books and came into this w/o any expectations and honestly was rivited. It really is worthy of a view, espeiclaly if you liked the first 2, this one is far faster paced than either of them were. Now after we rented it, we deicded to buy it. It's worth rewatching.
  • Did this even release in theatres?

    Grammazon
    1
    I couldn't even finish the book, shame on Dan Brown, so why would I watch the movie? Maybe because of Tom Hanks, Ron Howard and Felicity Jones?? Convince me please.
  • Very Well Done

    P4PA515
    5
    It is not surprising at all that critics panned this flick. However, the main character getting so tangled up in so many ways, as he always does, and it all sorting itself out in a very linear fashion I think would have just been a rehash of the previous movies. So this movie has a very nice twist, as the main character being just swept along by events beyond himself, this was a nice way to tell the story. I enjoyed it.
  • Should have ended the same as the book

    BrainyLady82
    1
    Totally ruined the larger story from the book. They totally switched the ending which made it a pointless movie to watch. Boooooo Ron Howard.

Inferno Comments

Inferno Movie Posters

Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster Inferno movie poster

keyboard_arrow_up